Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edith Saffo

Nurse Practitioner Wilmington, NC Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1235296013 CMS profile 11164880

1124 Gallery Park Boulevard, 200, Wilmington, NC 28412

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,022

749 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Edith Saffo of Wilmington, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,022 across 749 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,693 175
2024 General $3,466 163
2023 General $4,264 155
2022 General $2,724 158
2021 General $1,875 98

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edith Saffo
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edith Saffo were reported at $6,693. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Edith Saffo Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,875 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $2,724 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $4,264 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $3,466 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $6,693 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,818 189 payments
  2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $2,844 84 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,235 40 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,871 50 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,369 62 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,051 44 payments
  7. LEO Pharma Inc. $980 48 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $959 36 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $717 35 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $480 9 payments
  11. Other $2,699 152 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,502 738 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,879 3 payments
  3. Education $345 6 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $296 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,058 104 payments
  2. Bimzelx $1,937 25 payments
  3. SOTYKTU $1,871 50 payments
  4. Winlevi $1,356 8 payments
  5. ILUMYA $1,220 63 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $1,097 59 payments
  7. TREMFYA $953 32 payments
  8. COSENTYX $857 37 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $802 34 payments
  10. ADBRY $753 34 payments
  11. Other $7,245 385 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,460

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,125,266

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

14.1%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 14 $288,947
Skyrizi Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 11 $254,561
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 52 $196,528
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $147,618
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 25 $93,337
Otezla Apremilast Brand 17 $81,866
Pimecrolimus Generic 36 $13,796
Fluorouracil Generic 159 $10,440
Tretinoin Generic 125 $8,984
Tacrolimus Generic 27 $5,490

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$118,655

Of which drugs: $9,287

Medicare patients

829

Average age 74

Services billed

3,019

524 women, 305 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 21 30 $9,224
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 29 30 $59

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $525
$525 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $254
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $87
$342 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $238
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $95
$333 77 —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $309
$309 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $276
$276 25 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

749 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record