Who Paid My Doc
Douglas White
Emergency Medicine Oakland, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1245221548 CMS profile 740550
1411 E 31St St, Oakland, CA 94602
General payments
$220,011
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Douglas White of Oakland, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $220,011 across 45 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Emergency Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
6 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $42,599 | 9 | |
| 2024 | General | $64,473 | 6 | |
| 2023 | General | $28,150 | 25 | |
| 2022 | General | $17,153 | 2 | |
| 2020 | General | $37,200 | 1 | |
| 2019 | General | $30,436 | 2 |
Beside peers
- Douglas White
- Emergency Medicine median
- Middle half of Emergency Medicine
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Douglas White were reported at $42,599. Among 10,690 Emergency Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $57 and the middle half received between $24 and $150.
Show as a table
| Year | Douglas White | Emergency Medicine median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $30,436 | $51 | $18–$128 | $163 |
| 2020 | $37,200 | $29 | $16–$99 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $40 | $18–$124 | $132 |
| 2022 | $17,153 | $49 | $20–$134 | $149 |
| 2023 | $28,150 | $51 | $22–$142 | $160 |
| 2024 | $64,473 | $52 | $22–$150 | $164 |
| 2025 | $42,599 | $57 | $24–$150 | $169 |
Breakdown
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$18,313
Medicare patients
135
Services billed
174
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 39% | |
| Diabetes | 38% | |
| Arthritis | 37% | |
| Depression | 34% | |
| Heart failure | 33% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 27% | |
| COPD | 27% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
45 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Emergency Medicine in California
Michael Blue
Emergency Medicine · Lone Pine, CA
Andrew Accardi
Emergency Medicine · Encinitas, CA
Fredrick Melik-Abrahamian
Emergency Medicine · Sylmar, CA
Graham Walker
Emergency Medicine · Stanford, CA
Paul Pearigen
Emergency Medicine · San Diego, CA
Richard Kozak
Emergency Medicine · Mission Viejo, CA
Related records
Emergency Medicine in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Emergency Medicine
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.