Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Douglas Langford

Neurology Provo, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1659343564 CMS profile 119662

1055 N 500 W, Ste 212; Bldg C, Provo, UT 84604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$91,915

2,946 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Douglas Langford of Provo, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $91,915 across 2,946 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $26,841 412
2024 General $5,909 410
2023 General $6,150 446
2022 General $8,548 480
2021 General $35,385 464
2020 General $5,405 351
2019 General $3,677 383

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Douglas Langford
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Douglas Langford were reported at $26,841. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Douglas Langford Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,677 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $5,405 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $35,385 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $8,548 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $6,150 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $5,909 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $26,841 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $32,386 66 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $21,918 89 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $4,328 398 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $3,375 44 payments
  5. EMD Serono, Inc. $2,601 223 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,149 188 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $2,038 142 payments
  8. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,769 214 payments
  9. Biogen, Inc. $1,596 93 payments
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,078 52 payments
  11. Other $18,678 1,437 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $54,592 37 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $35,653 2,898 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,525 1 payment
  4. Education $145 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $35,761 110 payments
  2. ZAVZPRET $14,107 73 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT Pain $8,331 79 payments
  4. UBRELVY $2,133 215 payments
  5. QULIPTA $1,697 173 payments
  6. TYSABRI $1,217 73 payments
  7. KESIMPTA $1,029 85 payments
  8. ZEPOSIA $945 89 payments
  9. BOTOX $925 99 payments
  10. PERCEPT PC BRAINSENSE $903 39 payments
  11. Other $27,169 2,119 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

3,999

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,524,539

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

34.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 40 $402,422
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 25 $199,004
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 33 $178,223
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 74 $77,736
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 70 $74,135
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 75 $58,496
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 29 $57,073
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 71 $53,815
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 21 $48,827
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 31 $42,350

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$115,430

Of which drugs: $36,691

Medicare patients

369

Average age 72

Services billed

8,676

182 women, 187 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 54%
Depression 41%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Alzheimer's or dementia 23%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 15 7,350 $36,582
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 124 $86

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KESIMPTA
$516 40 —
UBRELVY
$463 70 —
BOTOX
$344 — 7,350
ZEPOSIA
$301 — —
Austedo XR
$289 33 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

2,946 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record