Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Dong Shin

Internal Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1740387646 CMS profile 33354

3030 W Olympic Blvd, 206, Los Angeles, CA 90006

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,160

286 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Dong Shin of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,160 across 286 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $416 16
2023 General $1,053 47
2022 General $1,301 59
2021 General $984 44
2020 General $737 34
2019 General $1,668 86

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Dong Shin
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Dong Shin were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Dong Shin Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,668 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $737 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $984 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,301 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,053 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $416 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,271 55 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $626 29 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $494 21 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $473 24 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $371 19 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $247 15 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $221 8 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $220 14 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $219 9 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $219 10 payments
  11. Other $1,799 82 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Food and Beverage $6,131 284 payments
  2. Education $29 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. FARXIGA $1,025 46 payments
  2. CREON $530 25 payments
  3. Kerendia $494 21 payments
  4. TRINTELLIX $310 15 payments
  5. BRILINTA $288 9 payments
  6. LINZESS $265 13 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $227 11 payments
  8. GEMTESA $225 11 payments
  9. XARELTO $221 8 payments
  10. ZENPEP $178 8 payments
  11. Other $3,505 166 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 220 drugs

Part D claims

23,851

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,379,653

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

31.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 409 $450,606
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 708 $424,908
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 644 $215,468
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 288 $187,038
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 315 $169,102
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 234 $136,958
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 117 $133,891
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 143 $133,570
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 190 $123,191
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 212 $114,018

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 220 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 69 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$599,825

Of which drugs: $6,669

Medicare patients

489

Average age 83

Services billed

9,702

325 women, 164 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 69%
Diabetes 65%
Alzheimer's or dementia 55%
Depression 52%
Chronic kidney disease 42%
Osteoporosis 39%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 22 113 $6,232
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 39 78 $73
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 21 29 $20
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 12 22 $6

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $92
$92 288 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $39
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $26
$65 212 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $54
$54 40 —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $46
$46 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $40
$40 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

286 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record