Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Dmitry Sukenik

Cardiovascular Disease Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1811985443 CMS profile 263631

7447 West Talcott Avenue Suite 304, Suite 304, Chicago, IL 60631

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,852

342 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Dmitry Sukenik of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,852 across 342 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,754 34
2024 General $1,060 45
2023 General $1,259 54
2022 General $1,308 68
2021 General $1,351 70
2020 General $465 29
2019 General $655 42

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Dmitry Sukenik
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Dmitry Sukenik were reported at $1,754. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Dmitry Sukenik Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $655 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $465 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,351 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $1,308 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $1,259 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $1,060 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $1,754 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,088 61 payments
  2. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $1,058 8 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $806 39 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $687 25 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $601 31 payments
  6. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $561 35 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $444 30 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $397 17 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $356 18 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $219 10 payments
  11. Other $1,635 68 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,132 337 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $697 3 payments
  3. Education $23 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VERQUVO $764 38 payments
  2. XARELTO $746 37 payments
  3. IGT Devices Undivided $611 3 payments
  4. LifeVest $561 35 payments
  5. ENTRESTO Cardiology/Vascular Diseases $494 24 payments
  6. ENTRESTO Cardiovascular $472 32 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $423 16 payments
  8. Intrasight Integrated $403 3 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $312 14 payments
  10. FARXIGA $269 18 payments
  11. Other $3,536 160 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

1,888

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$338,480

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

25.7%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 160 $176,983
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 44 $66,427
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 16 $30,373
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 28 $25,712
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 26 $19,603
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 228 $2,403
Labetalol Hcl Generic 91 $2,365
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 168 $1,710
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 49 $1,421
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 147 $1,304

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$165,980

Of which drugs: $640

Medicare patients

1,002

Average age 78

Services billed

2,985

515 women, 487 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 61%
Heart failure 57%
Ischemic heart disease 56%
Diabetes 50%
Atrial fibrillation 48%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Depression 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 26 98 $640

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENTRESTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $224
$224 16 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $178
$178 28 —
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $163
$163 — —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $123
$123 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $25
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $17
$42 160 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

342 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record