Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Divya Batra

Family Medicine Quincy, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1780896381 CMS profile 307580

1025 Maine St, Quincy, IL 62301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,588

809 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$433,481 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2024

Through program year 2025, Divya Batra of Quincy, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,588 across 809 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $433,481 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,363 173
2024 General $2,396 176
2023 General $2,322 168
2022 General $1,609 112
2021 General $1,154 109
2020 General $513 54
2019 General $232 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Divya Batra
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Divya Batra were reported at $2,363. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Divya Batra Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $232 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $513 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,154 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,609 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,322 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,396 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,363 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,765 171 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,271 114 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,095 91 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $972 51 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $937 73 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $498 33 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $445 29 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $409 24 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $356 14 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $309 18 payments
  11. Other $2,530 191 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,359 801 payments
  2. Education $191 3 payments
  3. Debt forgiveness $24 2 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $14 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $895 68 payments
  2. FARXIGA $772 40 payments
  3. Repatha $705 70 payments
  4. Otezla $704 69 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $624 53 payments
  6. QULIPTA $563 48 payments
  7. Ozempic $561 46 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $499 41 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $484 32 payments
  10. TRINTELLIX $388 22 payments
  11. Other $7,719 585 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 134 drugs

Part D claims

6,173

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$416,479

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 63 $58,380
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 45 $51,095
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 33 $31,338
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 41 $30,824
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 29 $29,746
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 41 $25,890
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 18 $21,776
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 32 $19,554
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 28 $19,087
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 22 $13,834

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 134 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,962

Of which drugs: $168

Medicare patients

16

Average age 77

Services billed

621

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$223 — —
FARXIGA
$174 41 —
UBRELVY
$159 — —
TRINTELLIX
$112 — —
MOUNJARO
$103 18 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

809 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record