Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Disha Shah

Clinical Neurophysiology Louisville, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1366671265 CMS profile 197881

6400 Dutchmans Pkwy, Suite 175, Louisville, KY 40205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$122,083

1,013 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Disha Shah of Louisville, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $122,083 across 1,013 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,929 153
2024 General $2,618 148
2023 General $9,477 144
2022 General $18,929 158
2021 General $41,957 151
2020 General $26,944 133
2019 General $18,229 126

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Disha Shah
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Disha Shah were reported at $3,929. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Disha Shah Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $18,229 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $26,944 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $41,957 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $18,929 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $9,477 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $2,618 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $3,929 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $69,171 120 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $35,892 144 payments
  3. EMD Serono, Inc. $2,825 23 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,185 47 payments
  5. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,007 20 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $759 32 payments
  7. LivaNova USA, Inc. $691 10 payments
  8. Biogen, Inc. $665 33 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $608 30 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $599 39 payments
  11. Other $8,680 515 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $101,315 48 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $16,710 950 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $2,400 1 payment
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,254 6 payments
  5. Education $404 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BOTOX Neuroscience $43,001 17 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $22,715 87 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $19,828 45 payments
  4. BOTOX Neuroscience $15,819 9 payments
  5. QULIPTA $3,842 44 payments
  6. PONVORY $1,007 20 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $702 64 payments
  8. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $567 64 payments
  9. VNS Therapy $552 3 payments
  10. APTIOM $531 37 payments
  11. Other $12,462 699 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 40 drugs

Part D claims

1,816

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$552,206

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

27.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hizentra Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 13 $279,195
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 41 $61,031
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 25 $44,284
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 28 $40,037
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 17 $26,641
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 16 $18,350
Pyridostigmine Bromide Er Pyridostigmine Bromide Brand 20 $11,191
Levetiracetam Generic 132 $10,192
Droxidopa Generic 14 $8,700
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 173 $7,638

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 40 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$64,988

Of which drugs: $42

Medicare patients

314

Average age 72

Services billed

894

190 women, 124 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 25%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
COPD 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 28 47 $42

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $175
$175 41 —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $168
$168 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $158
$158 28 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $139
$139 25 —
ULTOMIRIS
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $131
$131 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

1,013 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in Kentucky

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record