Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Dianne Petrone

Rheumatology Dallas, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1710919287 CMS profile 258850

712 N Washington Ave, Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75246

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$400,559

1,833 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$36,682 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Dianne Petrone of Dallas, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $400,559 across 1,833 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $36,682 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $26,812 52
2024 General $51,035 267
2023 General $46,735 271
2022 General $51,011 271
2021 General $40,974 312
2020 General $56,402 244
2019 General $127,589 416

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Dianne Petrone
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Dianne Petrone were reported at $26,812. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Dianne Petrone Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $127,589 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $56,402 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $40,974 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $51,011 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $46,735 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $51,035 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $26,812 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $77,905 368 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $60,898 232 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $58,948 163 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $51,374 219 payments
  5. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $46,751 76 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $28,305 99 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $25,595 117 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $19,077 70 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $9,735 92 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $8,366 63 payments
  11. Other $13,605 334 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $239,548 126 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $68,311 34 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $47,340 1,527 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $37,874 128 payments
  5. Honoraria $7,080 2 payments
  6. Education $406 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SIMPONI ARIA $83,809 177 payments
  2. TREMFYA $73,457 157 payments
  3. RINVOQ $48,480 235 payments
  4. COSENTYX $46,120 186 payments
  5. STELARA $37,109 53 payments
  6. KEVZARA $22,214 85 payments
  7. Enbrel $19,580 63 payments
  8. Otezla $15,161 55 payments
  9. ORENCIA $14,875 96 payments
  10. HUMIRA $11,136 69 payments
  11. Other $86,925 981 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

1,060

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,366,301

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

30%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 40 $387,128
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 29 $256,916
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 41 $238,462
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 16 $218,705
Orencia Abatacept Brand 17 $134,329
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 14 $100,340
Cevimeline Hcl Generic 65 $11,991
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 245 $6,391
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 148 $3,420
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 14 $2,148

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$216,677

Of which drugs: $155,907

Medicare patients

164

Average age 75

Services billed

13,723

142 women, 22 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 43%
Depression 29%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Cancer 17%
Diabetes 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 14 960 $19,612

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$21,218 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
$8,874 — —
KEVZARA
$7,796 — —
Otezla
$3,024 — —
Bimzelx
$2,002 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

1,833 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record