Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Deval Paranjpe

Ophthalmology Pittsburgh, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1265401558 CMS profile 283497

420 E North Ave, Suite 116, Pittsburgh, PA 15212

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$120,935

199 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Deval Paranjpe of Pittsburgh, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $120,935 across 199 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $26,108 39
2024 General $40,536 53
2023 General $47,893 64
2022 General $6,058 24
2021 General $109 6
2020 General $52 3
2019 General $180 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Deval Paranjpe
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Deval Paranjpe were reported at $26,108. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Deval Paranjpe Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $180 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $52 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $109 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $6,058 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $47,893 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $40,536 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $26,108 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $115,392 116 payments
  2. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,033 12 payments
  3. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,881 10 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $381 14 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $234 12 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $221 5 payments
  7. TissueTech, Inc. $137 2 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $120 7 payments
  9. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $84 4 payments
  10. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $77 4 payments
  11. Other $374 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $72,140 21 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $23,656 56 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $18,000 4 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $4,334 116 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $1,500 1 payment
  6. Honoraria $1,305 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cequa $115,376 115 payments
  2. TEPEZZA Tepezza $1,881 10 payments
  3. XDEMVY $533 11 payments
  4. XIIDRA $411 20 payments
  5. MIEBO $329 11 payments
  6. TEPEZZA Inflammation/Rare Disease $221 5 payments
  7. EYSUVIS $77 4 payments
  8. INVELTYS $77 4 payments
  9. PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL $72 3 payments
  10. RESTASIS $67 4 payments
  11. Other $658 31 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugs

Part D claims

1,045

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$373,704

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

49.8%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 113 $149,752
Cyclosporine Generic 130 $98,398
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 31 $46,522
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 15 $18,889
Zirgan Ganciclovir Brand 20 $13,060
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 149 $6,768
Tobramycin-Dexamethasone Tobramycin/Dexamethasone Brand 184 $6,707
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 56 $6,158
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 39 $5,565
Fluorometholone Generic 35 $4,104

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$98,482

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

261

Average age 74

Services billed

789

164 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 52%
Osteoporosis 23%
Diabetes 21%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Cancer 17%
Depression 16%
Chronic kidney disease 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $40,185
$40,185 15 —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $105
$105 31 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $72
$72 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $67
$67 — —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $36
$36 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

199 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record