Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Derek Hirschman

Dermatology Freeland, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1285016303 CMS profile 1351697

5120 Midland Rd, Freeland, MI 48623

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,955

909 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Derek Hirschman of Freeland, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,955 across 909 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,541 201
2024 General $3,226 181
2023 General $2,582 148
2022 General $2,600 155
2021 General $2,002 131
2020 General $753 41
2019 General $2,250 52

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Derek Hirschman
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Derek Hirschman were reported at $3,541. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Derek Hirschman Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,250 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $753 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,002 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,600 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,582 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,226 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,541 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,694 165 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,957 87 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,793 118 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,562 90 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $1,103 49 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $732 30 payments
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $722 29 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $664 27 payments
  9. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $630 36 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $578 39 payments
  11. Other $4,522 239 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,776 891 payments
  2. Education $1,179 18 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,529 51 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $1,341 65 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,079 66 payments
  4. ILUMYA $948 58 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $759 58 payments
  6. COSENTYX Immunology $682 43 payments
  7. COSENTYX Dermatology $649 64 payments
  8. SOTYKTU $578 39 payments
  9. HUMIRA $573 24 payments
  10. Otezla $544 26 payments
  11. Other $10,248 593 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

1,577

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$659,868

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

4.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 20 $418,250
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 57 $210,672
Ketoconazole Generic 387 $7,831
Fluorouracil Generic 98 $5,418
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 153 $4,370
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 354 $3,533
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 88 $2,914
Metronidazole Generic 46 $1,837
Ammonium Lactate Generic 72 $1,380
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 38 $1,092

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$357,128

Of which drugs: $164,333

Medicare patients

798

Average age 75

Services billed

5,639

413 women, 385 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 16%
Depression 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Cygnus dual, per square centimeter Q4282 Office 21 132 $76,753
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 30 $20

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$356 — —
TREMFYA
$292 — —
DUPIXENT
$290 57 —
SOTYKTU
$237 — —
COSENTYX
$221 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

909 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record