Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Deepika Shah

Ophthalmology Chevy Chase, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1316172489 CMS profile 195991

2 Wisconsin Cir, Suite 230, Chevy Chase, MD 20815

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$122,481

485 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$19,469 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2023

Through program year 2025, Deepika Shah of Chevy Chase, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $122,481 across 485 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $19,469 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $54,127 159
2024 General $52,659 132
2023 General $9,273 65
2022 General $3,806 51
2021 General $1,577 46
2020 General $291 15
2019 General $749 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Deepika Shah
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Deepika Shah were reported at $54,127. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Deepika Shah Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $749 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $291 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $1,577 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $3,806 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $9,273 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $52,659 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $54,127 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $57,978 117 payments
  2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $44,869 105 payments
  3. TissueTech, Inc. $12,409 25 payments
  4. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,168 12 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $886 66 payments
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $594 24 payments
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $592 25 payments
  8. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $590 20 payments
  9. Dompe US, Inc. $528 10 payments
  10. Harrow Eye, LLC $365 17 payments
  11. Other $2,503 64 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $75,860 26 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $16,040 6 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $12,468 383 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $10,928 67 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $7,185 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MIEBO $56,854 100 payments
  2. Cequa $44,883 106 payments
  3. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $26,667 101 payments
  4. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $20,000 40 payments
  5. PROKERA $9,831 14 payments
  6. EYSUVIS $1,119 10 payments
  7. BLINK NUTRITEARS $700 2 payments
  8. XDEMVY $590 20 payments
  9. OXERVATE $373 8 payments
  10. TYRVAYA $353 14 payments
  11. Other $5,898 180 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

833

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$539,298

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

58%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 166 $217,708
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 60 $87,448
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 82 $73,153
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 56 $58,184
Cyclosporine Generic 72 $41,829
Tyrvaya Varenicline Tartrate Brand 27 $26,107
Loteprednol Etabonate Generic 45 $8,177
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 12 $5,648
Lotemax Loteprednol Etabonate Brand 18 $5,542
Travoprost Generic 19 $3,348

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$313,002

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

694

Average age 75

Services billed

4,817

443 women, 251 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 40%
Osteoporosis 22%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Cancer 18%
Diabetes 17%
Depression 12%
Chronic kidney disease 11%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $17,409
$17,409 56 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $16,037
$16,037 82 —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $12,958
$12,958 60 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $260
$260 — —
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $197
$197 27 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

485 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record