Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Deborah Copeland

Family Medicine Hattiesburg, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1316058787 CMS profile 241431

110 Millsaps Dr, Hattiesburg, MS 39402

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,998

878 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Deborah Copeland of Hattiesburg, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,998 across 878 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,101 67
2024 General $1,081 51
2023 General $1,344 95
2022 General $2,418 149
2021 General $2,556 172
2020 General $2,304 172
2019 General $2,195 172

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Deborah Copeland
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Deborah Copeland were reported at $1,101. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Deborah Copeland Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,195 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,304 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,556 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,418 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,344 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,081 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,101 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,282 169 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,478 74 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,251 103 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,065 66 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $746 46 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $695 57 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $619 31 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $534 27 payments
  9. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $445 45 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $396 34 payments
  11. Other $3,487 226 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,998 878 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,354 94 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,065 70 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,031 41 payments
  4. JARDIANCE $765 45 payments
  5. XIFAXAN $603 30 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $577 48 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $496 35 payments
  8. AIRSUPRA $446 8 payments
  9. Livalo $445 45 payments
  10. Bystolic $386 40 payments
  11. Other $11,047 785 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 128 drugs

Part D claims

6,382

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$409,974

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

19.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 76 $80,320
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 46 $47,771
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 40 $41,585
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 46 $38,566
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 24 $24,278
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 29 $22,236
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 24 $16,812
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 22 $16,736
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $15,564
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 15 $11,817

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 128 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 94 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$169,693

Of which drugs: $31,317

Medicare patients

609

Average age 75

Services billed

8,317

387 women, 222 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Cancer 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 46 46 $1,625
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 112 260 $1,218
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 28 114 $93
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 27 48 $16

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $149
$149 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $143
$143 46 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $136
$136 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $98
  • Lilly USA, LLC $8
$107 40 —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $97
$97 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

878 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record