Medical Doctor Program year 2021 Reported 2019–2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Williams

Retina Specialist Baxter, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1558359554 CMS profile 69957

13800 Bluestem Ct, Baxter, MN 56425

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,500

1 record reported · program years 2019–2021

Research payments

$2,500

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2021, David Williams of Baxter, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,500 across 1 general payment and $2,500 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 Research $1,250 1
2020 Research $1,250 1
2019 General $8,500 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Williams
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Williams were reported at $0. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year David Williams Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $8,500 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $0 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $0 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $0 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $0 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $0 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $0 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $8,500 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Grant $8,500 1 payment
Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. IDx Technologies Inc. $2,500 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

357

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$12,561

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

37.8%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 106 $7,398
Atropine Sulfate Generic 14 $1,412
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 48 $1,124
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 50 $1,053
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 70 $912
Timolol Maleate Generic 29 $308
Latanoprost Generic 25 $232
Erythromycin Erythromycin Base Brand 15 $121

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,007,490

Of which drugs: $4,309,529

Medicare patients

1,168

Average age 79

Services billed

31,893

698 women, 470 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Depression 21%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 374 11,185 $2,010,640
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 210 2,236 $1,466,515
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 37 3,825 $447,981
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 21 720 $188,220
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 17 3,300 $90,540
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 28 635 $79,054
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 41 91 $4,888
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 21 $16

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

3 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Minnesota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record