Who Paid My Doc
David Thomas
Infectious Disease Baltimore, MD Medical Doctor
NPI 1265467070 CMS profile 598970
600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
General payments
$7,474
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, David Thomas of Baltimore, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,474 across 12 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $850 | 1 | |
| 2022 | General | $1,418 | 3 | |
| 2021 | General | $5,206 | 8 |
Beside peers
- David Thomas
- Infectious Disease median
- Middle half of Infectious Disease
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to David Thomas were reported at $850. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.
Show as a table
| Year | David Thomas | Infectious Disease median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $190 | $60–$862 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $124 | $32–$606 | $114 |
| 2021 | $5,206 | $148 | $38–$905 | $132 |
| 2022 | $1,418 | $166 | $50–$834 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $171 | $57–$787 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $176 | $52–$752 | $164 |
| 2025 | $850 | $188 | $57–$766 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$9,261
Medicare patients
60
Services billed
118
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Depression | 55% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 52% | |
| Arthritis | 50% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 48% | |
| Diabetes | 47% | |
| COPD | 42% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 40% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
12 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Infectious Disease in Maryland
Robert Redfield
Infectious Disease · Baltimore, MD
Luciana Borio
Infectious Disease · Baltimore, MD
Philip Krause
Infectious Disease · Potomac, MD
Mark Sulkowski
Infectious Disease · Baltimore, MD
Jonathan Zenilman
Infectious Disease · Baltimore, MD
Phuong Trinh
Infectious Disease · Silver Spring, MD
Related records
Infectious Disease in Maryland
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Infectious Disease
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Maryland
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.