Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Rodriguez

Miami, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1700980307 CMS profile 213149

8950 Sw 74Th Ct Ste 1706, Miami, FL 33156

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$26,695

513 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$9,359

Paid to them · 57 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,010,291 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, David Rodriguez of Miami, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $26,695 across 513 general payments and $9,359 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,010,291 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,534 74
2024 General $3,369 70
2023 General $4,084 102
2023 Research $4 2
2022 General $5,065 82
2021 General $4,208 76
2020 General $1,224 31
2020 Research $6,420 2
2019 General $5,211 78
2019 Research $2,935 53

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Rodriguez
  • Florida median
  • Middle half of Florida
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Rodriguez were reported at $3,534. Among 84,641 Florida profiles paid that year, the median was $195 and the middle half received between $59 and $690.

Show as a table
Year David Rodriguez Florida median Middle half National median
2019 $5,211 $197 $63–$719 $163
2020 $1,224 $126 $38–$436 $114
2021 $4,208 $151 $45–$537 $132
2022 $5,065 $175 $53–$607 $149
2023 $4,084 $183 $57–$637 $160
2024 $3,369 $185 $56–$647 $164
2025 $3,534 $195 $59–$690 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $4,197 57 payments
  2. LEO Pharma Inc. $2,052 35 payments
  3. EPI Health, LLC $1,853 14 payments
  4. Incyte Corporation $1,793 40 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,768 73 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG $1,490 6 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,335 39 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $1,319 26 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,272 18 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,046 43 payments
  11. Other $8,570 162 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,370 507 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,000 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,324 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JUBLIA $2,385 30 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,862 50 payments
  3. WYNZORA $1,853 14 payments
  4. DUOBRII $1,546 34 payments
  5. SOTYKTU $1,157 17 payments
  6. VTAMA $1,145 21 payments
  7. OPZELURA $1,035 31 payments
  8. Cimzia $907 52 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $753 13 payments
  10. ARAZLO $728 24 payments
  11. Other $15,176 328 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ichnos Sciences Inc. $6,420 2 payments
  2. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc. $2,935 53 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $4 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

2,356

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$338,943

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 22 $148,741
Jublia Efinaconazole Brand 77 $74,056
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 24 $47,968
Fluorouracil Generic 187 $18,870
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 240 $12,393
Ketoconazole Generic 470 $6,405
Ciclopirox Generic 112 $4,755
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 83 $3,997
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 239 $3,174
Hydrocortisone Generic 293 $3,089

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$33,538

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

100

Average age 76

Services billed

487

58 women, 42 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 62%
Depression 37%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $418
$418 24 —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $400
$400 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $186
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $150
$336 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $322
$322 — —
OLUMIANT
  • Lilly USA, LLC $230
$230 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

570 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record