Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Rhee

Ophthalmology Great Neck, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1417177569 CMS profile 18632

600 Northern Blvd, Suite 216, Great Neck, NY 11021

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,332

91 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$696,500 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, David Rhee of Great Neck, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,332 across 91 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $696,500 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 63rd percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $357 16
2024 General $603 20
2023 General $428 18
2022 General $271 8
2021 General $199 10
2020 General $74 4
2019 General $399 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Rhee
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Rhee were reported at $357. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year David Rhee Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $399 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $74 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $199 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $271 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $428 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $603 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $357 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $677 30 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $598 29 payments
  3. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $394 11 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $152 6 payments
  5. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $119 1 payment
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $106 1 payment
  7. Allergan Inc. $103 6 payments
  8. Sandoz Inc. $36 1 payment
  9. Coherus Biosciences Inc. $36 1 payment
  10. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $28 1 payment
  11. Other $82 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,332 91 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EYLEA $400 18 payments
  2. VABYSMO $399 19 payments
  3. Syfovre $351 9 payments
  4. EYLEA HD $277 12 payments
  5. Lucentis $199 10 payments
  6. OZURDEX Eye Care $135 5 payments
  7. OZURDEX Retina $121 7 payments
  8. INVELTYS $119 1 payment
  9. AcrySof IQ PanOptix UV IOL $106 1 payment
  10. AcrySof IQ VIVITY $106 1 payment
  11. Other $168 6 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 5 drugs

Part D claims

290

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$12,298

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

13.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 147 $7,218
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 21 $3,236
Ofloxacin Generic 75 $1,381
Latanoprost Generic 29 $267
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 18 $196

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,282,710

Of which drugs: $3,377,029

Medicare patients

1,577

Average age 78

Services billed

38,744

997 women, 580 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Cancer 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 302 2,170 $1,419,389
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 76 2,160 $568,796
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 143 2,707 $490,449
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 69 16,680 $452,196
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 67 3,660 $426,333
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 24 54 $3,058

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $241
$241 — 3,660
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $138
$138 — 2,160
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $134
$134 — 16,680
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —
Cimerli
  • Sandoz Inc. $36
$36 — 2,707

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

91 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record