Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2022 Reported 2019–2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Pugliese

Rheumatology Wilkes Barre, PA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1548225543 CMS profile 114724

675 Baltimore Dr, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$28,079

43 records reported · program years 2019–2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, David Pugliese of Wilkes Barre, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $28,079 across 43 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $76 3
2021 General $8,557 8
2020 General $1,950 2
2019 General $17,496 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Pugliese
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Pugliese were reported at $0. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year David Pugliese Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $17,496 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,950 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $8,557 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $76 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $0 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $0 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $0 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $24,286 39 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $3,793 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $24,200 17 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $2,850 6 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $1,029 20 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. RINVOQ Immunology $13,064 27 payments
  2. Actemra $3,793 4 payments
  3. RINVOQ Immunology $1,950 2 payments
  4. HUMIRA $1,491 2 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 53 drugs

Part D claims

4,819

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$7,629,929

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

35.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 221 $1,761,259
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 221 $1,383,466
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 169 $991,576
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 91 $657,423
Simponi Golimumab Brand 65 $441,713
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 68 $405,502
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 52 $291,802
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 14 $285,245
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 21 $248,317
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 32 $236,850

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 53 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$42,041

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

352

Average age 71

Services billed

1,178

266 women, 86 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 70%
Osteoporosis 41%
Depression 26%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
COPD 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

43 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record