Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Nieves

Dermatology East Windsor, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1922075068 CMS profile 42317

59 One Mile Rd, Ste G, East Windsor, NJ 08520

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$84,335

823 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Nieves of East Windsor, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $84,335 across 823 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,769 102
2024 General $2,132 131
2023 General $2,123 149
2022 General $3,137 103
2021 General $31,706 101
2020 General $10,459 97
2019 General $33,010 140

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Nieves
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Nieves were reported at $1,769. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year David Nieves Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $33,010 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $10,459 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $31,706 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $3,137 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,123 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,132 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,769 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $31,634 230 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $30,167 16 payments
  3. Dermira, Inc. $11,172 11 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $3,006 79 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,852 119 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $1,196 39 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $819 49 payments
  8. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $641 26 payments
  9. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $634 47 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $625 32 payments
  11. Other $2,588 175 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $52,164 19 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,418 774 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $9,315 5 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $7,861 13 payments
  5. Honoraria $2,000 1 payment
  6. Education $577 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $21,091 116 payments
  2. QBREXZA $11,159 10 payments
  3. HUMIRA $9,565 40 payments
  4. COSENTYX Immunology $1,856 24 payments
  5. TREMFYA $1,780 114 payments
  6. COSENTYX Dermatology $903 41 payments
  7. RINVOQ $873 68 payments
  8. VTAMA $691 50 payments
  9. CIBINQO $679 47 payments
  10. LITFULO $561 39 payments
  11. Other $5,559 357 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,215

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$593,839

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

12.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 18 $222,381
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 23 $188,219
Otezla Apremilast Brand 21 $98,633
Enstilar Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Brand 15 $23,496
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 11 $8,932
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 130 $8,460
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 157 $7,917
Calcipotriene-Betamethasone Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Brand 13 $7,018
Tacrolimus Generic 47 $5,663
Ketoconazole Generic 217 $5,060

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$465,191

Of which drugs: $239,905

Medicare patients

763

Average age 75

Services billed

5,896

309 women, 454 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Depression 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 23 41 $12,692
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 45 104 $74

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
COSENTYX
$347 — —
VTAMA
$327 — —
SKYRIZI
$299 — —
SOTYKTU
$170 — —
CIBINQO
$112 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

823 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record