Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Naylor

Family Medicine Conway, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1730166844 CMS profile 306010

2425 Dave Ward Dr, Ste 401, Conway, AR 72034

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,672

1,303 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$100,807

3 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Through program year 2025, David Naylor of Conway, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,672 across 1,303 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $100,807 across 3 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,406 158
2024 General $2,277 151
2023 General $2,421 196
2022 General $2,312 188
2021 General $2,455 210
2020 General $2,202 171
2019 General $2,599 229
2025 Ownership $807 1
2024 Ownership $50,000 1
2023 Ownership $50,000 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Naylor
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Naylor were reported at $2,406. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year David Naylor Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,599 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,202 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,455 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,312 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,421 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,277 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,406 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,836 127 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,628 133 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,467 205 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,414 46 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,160 105 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $986 91 payments
  7. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $783 44 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $688 55 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $623 30 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $539 38 payments
  11. Other $5,548 429 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,482 1,298 payments
  2. Education $190 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,417 96 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,098 24 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,085 164 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,084 74 payments
  5. REXULTI $783 44 payments
  6. QULIPTA $692 37 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $579 51 payments
  8. FreeStyle Libre $574 48 payments
  9. UBRELVY $522 51 payments
  10. TRULICITY $503 46 payments
  11. Other $14,830 1,063 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 228 drugs

Part D claims

21,753

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,704,006

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 206 $203,303
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 494 $189,258
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 257 $143,951
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 22 $135,454
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 163 $99,281
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 92 $97,312
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 117 $80,180
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 67 $72,005
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 94 $46,490
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 79 $40,999

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 228 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 28 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$22,732

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

280

Average age 78

Services billed

506

169 women, 111 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 32%
Atrial fibrillation 30%
Heart failure 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
$227 18 —
NURTEC ODT
$184 — —
QULIPTA
$129 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$126 117 —
VRAYLAR
$111 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

1,303 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record