Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Morledge

Neurology Austin, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1225129703 CMS profile 236754

711 W 38Th St, Bldg. F, Austin, TX 78705

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$127,725

1,260 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Morledge of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $127,725 across 1,260 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $44 2
2024 General $19,547 136
2023 General $19,404 205
2022 General $26,242 215
2021 General $23,817 229
2020 General $17,553 196
2019 General $21,119 277

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Morledge
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Morledge were reported at $44. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year David Morledge Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $21,119 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $17,553 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $23,817 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $26,242 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $19,404 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $19,547 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $44 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $70,741 195 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $28,875 71 payments
  3. US WorldMeds, LLC $10,442 58 payments
  4. Genentech, Inc. $2,020 1 payment
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,173 84 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,086 73 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $853 42 payments
  8. EMD Serono, Inc. $814 70 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $794 51 payments
  10. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $668 37 payments
  11. Other $10,260 578 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $94,940 52 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $21,782 1,161 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $8,312 41 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,170 2 payments
  5. Honoraria $500 1 payment
  6. Education $22 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BOTOX Neuroscience $46,605 48 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $27,414 65 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $11,073 23 payments
  4. MYOBLOC $9,458 37 payments
  5. BOTOX Neuroscience $8,311 14 payments
  6. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $4,858 25 payments
  7. OCREVUS $2,949 77 payments
  8. QULIPTA $1,134 42 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $792 59 payments
  10. DUOPA $630 34 payments
  11. Other $15,678 913 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 115 drugs

Part D claims

5,003

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,578,731

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 52 $267,552
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 14 $141,214
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 15 $137,701
Gocovri Amantadine Hcl Brand 35 $121,960
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 74 $113,581
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 20 $113,246
Avonex (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 13 $103,852
Neupro Rotigotine Brand 71 $66,639
Glatopa Glatiramer Acetate Brand 12 $60,429
Dalfampridine Er Dalfampridine Brand 39 $59,452

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 115 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$232,904

Of which drugs: $143,208

Medicare patients

338

Average age 74

Services billed

29,726

177 women, 161 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 49%
Depression 39%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Osteoporosis 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 38 19,555 $93,137
Injection, incobotulinumtoxin a, 1 unit J0588 Office 25 8,430 $33,207

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
$17,282 29 19,555
OCREVUS
$253 — —
Gocovri
$249 35 —
KESIMPTA
$168 14 —
Austedo XR
$112 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,260 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record