Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Meyer

Neurology Winston-Salem, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1205879558 CMS profile 625257

145 Kimel Park Dr, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, NC 27103

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$154,799

305 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Meyer of Winston-Salem, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $154,799 across 305 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $810 17
2024 General $20,580 27
2023 General $27,356 48
2022 General $6,200 21
2021 General $6,089 27
2020 General $22,245 47
2019 General $71,519 118

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Meyer
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Meyer were reported at $810. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year David Meyer Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $71,519 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $22,245 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $6,089 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $6,200 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $27,356 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $20,580 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $810 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMD Serono, Inc. $83,451 132 payments
  2. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $48,756 73 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $8,482 25 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $6,735 12 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2,485 8 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $1,420 11 payments
  7. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,050 2 payments
  8. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $837 3 payments
  9. Biogen, Inc. $452 12 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $442 12 payments
  11. Other $689 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $89,607 41 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $39,992 19 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $16,493 57 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $8,544 183 payments
  5. Education $163 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Mavenclad Neurology $20,610 26 payments
  2. Mavenclad Neurology $8,953 24 payments
  3. AUBAGIO $7,999 14 payments
  4. Evobrutinib $6,600 1 payment
  5. VRAYLAR $5,585 9 payments
  6. REBIF Neurology $4,386 5 payments
  7. Rebif Neurology $4,231 7 payments
  8. ULTOMIRIS $1,699 2 payments
  9. LATUDA $1,050 2 payments
  10. Ajovy $837 3 payments
  11. Other $4,435 87 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 78 drugs

Part D claims

4,450

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$3,107,288

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 69 $700,849
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 49 $377,657
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 27 $290,379
Rebif Rebidose Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 26 $285,075
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 17 $220,094
Tysabri Natalizumab Brand 20 $179,604
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 20 $164,257
Rebif Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 14 $148,022
Betaseron Interferon Beta-1b Brand 15 $137,070
Teriflunomide Generic 130 $122,444

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 78 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 28 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$104,676

Of which drugs: $74,675

Medicare patients

163

Average age 70

Services billed

13,754

115 women, 48 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 42%
Depression 37%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 19%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 15 8,600 $40,034

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPOSIA
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $76
  • Celgene Corporation $35
$111 — —
Leqembi
  • Eisai Inc. $103
$103 — —
KESIMPTA
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $48
$48 — —
BRIUMVI
  • TG Therapeutics, Inc. $23
$23 — —
ULTOMIRIS
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

305 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record