Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Kloth

Danbury, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1336137058 CMS profile 15126

109 Newtown Rd, Suite 1, Danbury, CT 06810

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$167,474

147 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$100

1 holding reported · through program year 2025

Through program year 2025, David Kloth of Danbury, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $167,474 across 147 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $100 across 1 holding.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $267 4
2024 General $553 8
2023 General $120,256 24
2022 General $922 18
2021 General $611 11
2020 General $905 12
2019 General $43,961 70
2019 Ownership $100 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Kloth
  • Connecticut median
  • Middle half of Connecticut
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Kloth were reported at $267. Among 12,665 Connecticut profiles paid that year, the median was $167 and the middle half received between $54 and $639.

Show as a table
Year David Kloth Connecticut median Middle half National median
2019 $43,961 $163 $50–$671 $163
2020 $905 $111 $33–$382 $114
2021 $611 $124 $39–$443 $132
2022 $922 $138 $45–$535 $149
2023 $120,256 $148 $47–$556 $160
2024 $553 $157 $49–$599 $164
2025 $267 $167 $54–$639 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Curonix LLC $100,000 1 payment
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $33,082 83 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $19,196 3 payments
  4. Stimwave Technologies Incorporated $13,087 34 payments
  5. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $1,006 9 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $456 3 payments
  7. Epimed International, Inc $128 1 payment
  8. DePuy Synthes Sales Inc. $122 1 payment
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $111 2 payments
  10. Medtronic USA, Inc. $99 1 payment
  11. Other $186 9 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Acquisitions $100,000 1 payment
  2. Debt forgiveness $19,143 1 payment
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $18,500 4 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $12,750 3 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $7,848 115 payments
  6. Travel and Lodging $6,339 14 payments
  7. Entertainment $2,654 5 payments
  8. Gift $239 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SPECTRA WAVEWRITER $29,130 19 payments
  2. GENERAL THERAPIES $991 5 payments
  3. Superion Indirect Decompression System $663 9 payments
  4. GENERAL PAIN MANAGEMENT $641 14 payments
  5. Evoke $550 5 payments
  6. Evoke SCS $456 4 payments
  7. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $364 2 payments
  8. GENERAL - PAIN MANAGEMENT Pain Management $349 5 payments
  9. Superion $190 2 payments
  10. General - Pain Management General - Pain Management_NMD $145 5 payments
  11. Other $1,738 31 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

3,680

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$177,853

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

35.8%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Percocet Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 13 $41,136
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 46 $40,173
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 15 $24,435
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 674 $17,343
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 404 $9,828
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 580 $8,694
Nucynta Er Tapentadol Hcl Brand 16 $7,593
Gabapentin Generic 380 $6,051
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 129 $3,284
Pregabalin Generic 125 $2,966

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$393,944

Of which drugs: $12,726

Medicare patients

456

Average age 73

Services billed

25,292

239 women, 217 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Diabetes 27%
Depression 27%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, synvisc or synvisc-one, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7325 Office 19 1,200 $8,167
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 245 14,751 $1,471
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 123 1,380 $1,074
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 50 59 $297
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 245 403 $116
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 20 mg J1020 Office 18 20 $110
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 12 12 $84
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 29 550 $50

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

147 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record