Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Holmes

Cardiovascular Disease Opelika, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1467489286 CMS profile 338204

2601 Village Professional Dr N, Opelika, AL 36801

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,447

461 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Holmes of Opelika, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,447 across 461 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,740 54
2024 General $1,873 62
2023 General $2,263 58
2022 General $1,198 43
2021 General $1,686 73
2020 General $1,903 86
2019 General $1,785 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Holmes
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Holmes were reported at $1,740. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year David Holmes Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $1,785 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $1,903 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,686 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $1,198 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $2,263 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $1,873 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $1,740 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,994 57 payments
  2. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $1,129 50 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,024 43 payments
  4. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. $786 14 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $707 38 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $575 14 payments
  7. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $553 16 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $478 34 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $450 14 payments
  10. United Therapeutics Corporation $411 16 payments
  11. Other $4,340 165 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,267 454 payments
  2. Entertainment $141 2 payments
  3. Education $38 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UPTRAVI $1,039 46 payments
  2. OPSUMIT $927 36 payments
  3. Repatha $821 37 payments
  4. ECM Patch,Pouch $760 13 payments
  5. LifeVest $553 16 payments
  6. XARELTO $478 34 payments
  7. Vascepa $382 19 payments
  8. FARXIGA $368 9 payments
  9. LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor $360 10 payments
  10. FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER, S $348 3 payments
  11. Other $7,455 298 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 69 drugs

Part D claims

6,560

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$2,924,852

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

35.7%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Adempas Riociguat Brand 61 $900,504
Opsumit Macitentan Brand 47 $772,714
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 610 $522,107
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 213 $168,559
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 232 $152,320
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 165 $146,331
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 85 $60,914
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 71 $54,196
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 21 $22,244
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 42 $21,671

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 69 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 118 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$364,749

Of which drugs: $3,060

Medicare patients

1,329

Average age 75

Services billed

5,460

709 women, 620 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 51%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 37%
Atrial fibrillation 37%
Heart failure 36%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
COPD 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 105 420 $2,285
Injection, perflutren lipid microspheres, per ml Q9957 Office 24 24 $758

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $148
$148 232 —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $133
$133 — —
OPSUMIT
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $107
$107 47 —
UPTRAVI
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $107
$107 — —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $92
$92 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

461 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record