Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Greeley

Neurology Spokane, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1386758712 CMS profile 107673

1520 W 3Rd Ave Ste 101, Spokane, WA 99201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$38,679

938 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,366

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$8,445,964 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, David Greeley of Spokane, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $38,679 across 938 general payments and $2,366 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $8,445,964 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,081 136
2024 General $3,262 124
2023 General $10,922 111
2023 Research $410 1
2022 General $8,618 131
2022 Research $794 1
2021 General $6,358 191
2021 Research $1,162 1
2020 General $2,285 121
2019 General $2,153 124

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Greeley
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Greeley were reported at $5,081. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year David Greeley Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,153 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $2,285 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $6,358 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $8,618 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $10,922 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $3,262 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $5,081 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eisai Inc. $12,852 37 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $7,152 64 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,237 115 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,729 151 payments
  5. Ipsen Innovation $1,668 5 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,488 73 payments
  7. Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC $1,475 39 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $798 50 payments
  9. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $760 37 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $655 30 payments
  11. Other $7,866 337 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,762 913 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $16,445 6 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,146 7 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $221 7 payments
  5. Education $105 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Leqembi $9,597 39 payments
  2. ADUHELM $5,780 43 payments
  3. QULIPTA $997 55 payments
  4. UBRELVY $932 45 payments
  5. Xeomin musculoskeletal $910 26 payments
  6. Xeomin musculoskeletal $817 21 payments
  7. EMGALITY $740 44 payments
  8. BOTOX $683 43 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $659 33 payments
  10. Austedo XR $595 31 payments
  11. Other $12,524 638 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,366 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

895

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$151,677

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

36.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 35 $43,632
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 18 $26,767
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 12 $17,756
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 21 $17,198
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 11 $13,200
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 12 $10,183
Rasagiline Mesylate Generic 51 $6,108
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 169 $3,736
Rivastigmine Generic 23 $2,509
Donepezil Hcl Generic 180 $1,929

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$374,036

Of which drugs: $177,764

Medicare patients

455

Average age 72

Services billed

46,484

299 women, 156 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 56%
Arthritis 51%
Depression 41%
Alzheimer's or dementia 34%
Osteoporosis 23%
Diabetes 16%
Ischemic heart disease 15%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 38 20,890 $94,811
Injection, incobotulinumtoxin a, 1 unit J0588 Office 45 20,200 $79,600

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Xeomin
$501 — 20,200
Leqembi
$366 — —
Austedo XR
$238 — —
CAPLYTA
$202 — —
KISUNLA
$193 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

941 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record