Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Gelber

Neurology Springfield, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1669571113 CMS profile 29939

800 N. 1St Street, Springfield, IL 62702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,764

280 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Gelber of Springfield, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,764 across 280 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $47 2
2024 General $1,660 85
2023 General $1,288 77
2022 General $554 35
2021 General $418 30
2020 General $110 7
2019 General $7,688 44

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Gelber
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Gelber were reported at $47. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year David Gelber Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,688 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $110 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $418 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $554 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $1,288 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $1,660 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $47 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $7,946 60 payments
  2. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $597 21 payments
  3. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $536 13 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $515 27 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $492 56 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $396 26 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $313 18 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $233 20 payments
  9. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $231 14 payments
  10. Argenx US, Inc. $135 5 payments
  11. Other $371 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $6,746 12 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $3,769 258 payments
  3. Education $707 9 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $542 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OCREVUS $7,929 58 payments
  2. ACTHAR $597 21 payments
  3. ZEPOSIA $492 55 payments
  4. KESIMPTA $370 24 payments
  5. TYSABRI $313 18 payments
  6. ULTOMIRIS $267 7 payments
  7. VUMERITY $227 13 payments
  8. Ajovy $197 22 payments
  9. UBRELVY $197 18 payments
  10. INBRIJA $181 10 payments
  11. Other $1,293 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 76 drugs

Part D claims

6,614

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$4,384,262

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

18.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 54 $973,671
Betaseron Interferon Beta-1b Brand 78 $757,514
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 55 $564,167
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 34 $373,929
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 28 $370,369
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 38 $268,165
Rebif Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 22 $239,859
Teriflunomide Generic 53 $155,763
Dimethyl Fumarate Generic 23 $120,483
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 66 $110,756

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 76 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,544,331

Of which drugs: $1,425,377

Medicare patients

700

Average age 69

Services billed

37,646

394 women, 306 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Depression 29%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
COPD 19%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ocrelizumab, 1 mg J2350 Office 20 21,000 $950,886
Injection, baclofen, 10 mg J0475 Office 11 298 $38,779
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 24 3,926 $893
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 27 84 $50
Infusion, normal saline solution, sterile (500 ml = 1 unit) J7040 Office 21 37 $37

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $269
$269 — —
ULTOMIRIS
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $236
$236 — —
KESIMPTA
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $176
$176 55 —
OCREVUS
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $156
$156 — 21,000
ZEPOSIA
  • Celgene Corporation $135
$135 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

280 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record