Medical Doctor Program year 2020 Reported 2019–2020 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Gazeley

Rheumatology Milwaukee, WI Medical Doctor

NPI 1932228723 CMS profile 1044961

9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$0

None reported · program years 2019–2020

Research payments

$1,319

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2020

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$256,024 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2020, David Gazeley of Milwaukee, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $0 across 0 general payments and $1,319 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $256,024 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 41st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2020 Research $463 1
2019 Research $856 1

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

1,641

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,888,314

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 70 $664,727
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 21 $237,194
Tavneos Avacopan Brand 13 $213,325
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 35 $156,398
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $153,984
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 29 $134,305
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $109,649
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 16 $106,199
Orencia Abatacept Brand 11 $62,585
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 409 $16,532

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$23,320

Of which drugs: $1,946

Medicare patients

147

Average age 70

Services billed

480

106 women, 41 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Osteoporosis 28%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 22%
Diabetes 19%
Cancer 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

2 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record