Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Filsoof

Cardiovascular Disease Beverly Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1861686354 CMS profile 1379241

150 N Robertson Blvd, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$142,195

1,031 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Filsoof of Beverly Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $142,195 across 1,031 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $53,569 193
2024 General $41,097 215
2023 General $27,836 197
2022 General $5,343 164
2021 General $6,161 150
2020 General $5,901 64
2019 General $2,288 48

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Filsoof
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Filsoof were reported at $53,569. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year David Filsoof Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $2,288 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $5,901 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $6,161 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $5,343 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $27,836 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $41,097 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $53,569 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $60,862 69 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $22,307 173 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $18,745 68 payments
  4. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $14,898 79 payments
  5. Boston Scientific Corporation $4,825 35 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $4,501 9 payments
  7. HeartFlow, Inc. $2,100 48 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $1,853 31 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,451 77 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,251 66 payments
  11. Other $9,403 376 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $113,376 54 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $25,488 963 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,200 9 payments
  4. Education $130 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Wegovy $54,913 42 payments
  2. Repatha Cardiology $18,521 140 payments
  3. LifeVest $14,898 79 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $11,550 34 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $7,121 31 payments
  6. Xofluza $4,501 9 payments
  7. REPATHA Cardiovascular $3,362 25 payments
  8. WATCHMAN Structural Heart $2,598 15 payments
  9. FFRct $2,100 48 payments
  10. Watchman Structural Heart $1,500 1 payment
  11. Other $17,012 663 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 112 drugs

Part D claims

5,776

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,747,837

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

36.5%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 598 $507,693
Arcalyst Rilonacept Brand 12 $253,577
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 161 $155,964
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 140 $138,010
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 160 $134,502
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 146 $131,616
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 72 $73,219
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 79 $61,403
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 48 $51,097
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 99 $35,436

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 112 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,982,056

Of which drugs: $8,487

Medicare patients

1,807

Average age 77

Services billed

16,335

893 women, 914 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 60%
Arthritis 60%
Diabetes 45%
Heart failure 42%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Atrial fibrillation 34%
Depression 33%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 303 1,361 $7,228
Injection, aminophyllin, up to 250 mg J0280 Office 184 184 $1,259

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Wegovy
$11,884 — —
JARDIANCE
$11,778 160 —
Repatha
$6,220 639 —
Arcalyst
$307 12 —
LEQVIO
$240 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

1,031 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record