Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Chu

Hematology & Oncology Port Jefferson Station, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1750585287 CMS profile 124782

49 Nesconset Hwy, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$654

19 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$291

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$369,935 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, David Chu of Port Jefferson Station, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $654 across 19 general payments and $291 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $369,935 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 35th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $15 1
2024 General $192 2
2023 General $144 3
2022 General $17 1
2021 General $207 7
2020 General $64 4
2019 General $14 1
2019 Research $291 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Chu
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Chu were reported at $15. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year David Chu Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $14 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $64 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $207 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $17 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $144 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $192 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $15 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Intera Oncology, Inc $192 2 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $131 2 payments
  3. Kite Pharma, Inc. $128 8 payments
  4. Sirtex Medical Inc $100 1 payment
  5. ADC Therapeutics America, Inc. $25 1 payment
  6. Tactile Systems Technology Inc $19 1 payment
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $17 1 payment
  8. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $15 1 payment
  9. Mylan Institutional Inc. $14 1 payment
  10. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $12 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $642 18 payments
  2. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTERA $192 2 payments
  2. CALQUENCE $131 2 payments
  3. SIR-Spheres Microspheres $100 1 payment
  4. Flexitouch Plus $19 1 payment
  5. Entre Plus $19 1 payment
  6. XOSPATA $17 1 payment
  7. GIVLAARI $15 1 payment
  8. Ogivri $14 1 payment
  9. Fulphila $14 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $291 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 57 drugs

Part D claims

2,125

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$6,723,659

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

60.4%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Aranesp Darbepoetin Alfa In Polysorbat Brand 237 $708,611
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 46 $707,410
Lenvima Lenvatinib Mesylate Brand 19 $458,185
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 29 $450,106
Somatuline Depot Lanreotide Acetate Brand 40 $366,167
Lenalidomide Generic 24 $339,107
Nplate Romiplostim Brand 22 $330,747
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 16 $282,976
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 16 $278,274
Keytruda Pembrolizumab Brand 23 $260,327

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 57 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 286 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,307,479

Of which drugs: $2,067,459

Medicare patients

2,630

Average age 75

Services billed

241,337

1,491 women, 1,139 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Ischemic heart disease 45%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Cancer 37%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
COPD 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 27 13,400 $597,081
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 61 7,680 $158,386
Injection, immune globulin, (octagam), intravenous, non-lyophilized (e.g., liquid), 500 mg J1568 Office 13 3,090 $114,773
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 100 84,001 $73,140
Injection, darbepoetin alfa, 1 microgram (non-esrd use) J0881 Office 21 14,401 $32,654
Injection, fosnetupitant 235 mg and palonosetron 0.25 mg J1454 Office 27 55 $29,451
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 29 29 $2,343
Injection, iron sucrose, 1 mg J1756 Office 36 8,401 $1,504
Injection, leucovorin calcium, per 50 mg J0640 Office 15 306 $1,045
Injection, carboplatin, 50 mg J9045 Office 16 216 $606

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

20 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record