Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Campbell

Internal Medicine Fort Wayne, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1023109345 CMS profile 46016

11141 Parkview Plaza Dr Ste 200, Fort Wayne, IN 46845

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,012

571 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Campbell of Fort Wayne, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,012 across 571 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $426 25
2024 General $2,200 116
2023 General $1,788 99
2022 General $2,311 98
2021 General $1,873 105
2020 General $659 36
2019 General $1,755 92

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Campbell
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Campbell were reported at $426. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year David Campbell Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,755 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $659 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,873 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,311 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,788 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,200 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $426 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,569 189 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,143 115 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $720 37 payments
  4. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $572 3 payments
  5. Stryker Corporation $559 6 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $539 28 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $383 19 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $330 17 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $329 13 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $324 17 payments
  11. Other $2,543 127 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,361 563 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $572 3 payments
  3. Education $79 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,631 121 payments
  2. Da Vinci Surgical System $572 3 payments
  3. Otezla $562 36 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $534 38 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $505 34 payments
  6. Enbrel Inflammation $489 27 payments
  7. TAVNEOS $467 19 payments
  8. HUMIRA $354 28 payments
  9. COSENTYX $346 23 payments
  10. TREMFYA $337 17 payments
  11. Other $7,013 337 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

3,770

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$9,966,558

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

57.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 446 $3,655,473
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 307 $2,612,953
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 96 $779,594
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 117 $679,756
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 86 $659,148
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 37 $255,980
Orencia Abatacept Brand 34 $243,621
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 34 $237,311
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 31 $220,581
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 40 $218,983

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 4 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$31,927

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

224

Average age 74

Services billed

835

138 women, 86 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 23%
COPD 21%
Osteoporosis 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $515
$515 31 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $189
$189 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $147
$147 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $138
$138 628 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $130
$130 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

571 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record