Who Paid My Doc
David Benditt
Cardiovascular Disease St Cloud, MN Medical Doctor
NPI 1073559134 CMS profile 139110
1200 Sixth Ave N, Centracare Clinic, St Cloud, MN 56303
General payments
$11,444
Research payments
$270,027
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$2,654
Through program year 2025, David Benditt of St Cloud, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,444 across 75 general payments and $270,027 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,654 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
14 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $420 | 5 | |
| 2025 | Research | $35,280 | 34 | |
| 2024 | General | $117 | 3 | |
| 2024 | Research | $47,327 | 38 | |
| 2023 | General | $117 | 2 | |
| 2023 | Research | $46,502 | 33 | |
| 2022 | General | $378 | 16 | |
| 2022 | Research | $46,328 | 34 | |
| 2021 | General | $8,801 | 10 | |
| 2021 | Research | $24,391 | 16 | |
| 2020 | General | $54 | 4 | |
| 2020 | Research | $39,717 | 26 | |
| 2019 | General | $1,558 | 35 | |
| 2019 | Research | $30,481 | 21 |
Beside peers
- David Benditt
- Cardiovascular Disease median
- Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to David Benditt were reported at $420. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.
Show as a table
| Year | David Benditt | Cardiovascular Disease median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $1,558 | $450 | $127–$1,392 | $163 |
| 2020 | $54 | $242 | $77–$751 | $114 |
| 2021 | $8,801 | $335 | $101–$1,037 | $132 |
| 2022 | $378 | $395 | $121–$1,211 | $149 |
| 2023 | $117 | $443 | $136–$1,283 | $160 |
| 2024 | $117 | $450 | $136–$1,323 | $164 |
| 2025 | $420 | $432 | $132–$1,252 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 10 drugsPart D claims
380
Drug cost
$93,116
Branded share of claims
32.1%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xarelto Rivaroxaban | Brand | 37 | $56,945 | |
| Eliquis Apixaban | Brand | 15 | $21,229 | |
| Midodrine Hcl | Generic | 94 | $7,558 | |
| Fludrocortisone Acetate | Generic | 73 | $2,906 | |
| Metoprolol Succinate | Generic | 53 | $1,278 | |
| Sodium Chloride 0.9 % Sodium Chloride | Brand | 38 | $1,271 | |
| Flecainide Acetate | Generic | 18 | $781 | |
| Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl | Brand | 21 | $558 | |
| Sotalol Sotalol Hcl | Brand | 11 | $396 | |
| Warfarin Sodium | Generic | 20 | $194 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$61,088
Medicare patients
1,430
Services billed
2,634
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 51% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 50% | |
| Heart failure | 49% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 45% | |
| Arthritis | 39% | |
| Diabetes | 37% | |
| Depression | 35% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
277 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Cardiovascular Disease in Minnesota
Jeffrey Chambers
Cardiovascular Disease · Minneapolis, MN
Srijoy Mahapatra
Cardiovascular Disease · Rochester, MN
Markus Meyer
Cardiovascular Disease · Minneapolis, MN
Robert Schwartz
Cardiovascular Disease · Minneapolis, MN
Robert Vantassel
Cardiovascular Disease · Minneapolis, MN
Charanjit Rihal
Cardiovascular Disease · Rochester, MN
Related records
Cardiovascular Disease in Minnesota
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Cardiovascular Disease
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Minnesota
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.