Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2021 Reported 2019–2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daryl Ficklin

Internal Medicine Twin Falls, ID Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1346213303 CMS profile 196299

775 Pole Line Rd W, Suite 302, Twin Falls, ID 83301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23

2 records reported · program years 2019–2021

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2021, Daryl Ficklin of Twin Falls, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23 across 2 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 9th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 General $11 1
2019 General $12 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daryl Ficklin
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daryl Ficklin were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Daryl Ficklin Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $12 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $11 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $0 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $0 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $12 1 payment
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $11 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Food and Beverage $23 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. EMGALITY $12 1 payment
  2. AUSTEDO $11 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 213 drugs

Part D claims

17,268

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,830,346

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 11 $295,447
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 181 $167,820
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 22 $161,479
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 147 $151,273
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 178 $150,282
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 104 $128,918
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 93 $81,375
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 88 $66,083
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 106 $60,463
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 35 $44,115

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 213 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$69,047

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

394

Average age 76

Services billed

1,495

197 women, 197 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
COPD 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

2 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record