Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Danielle Martin

Nurse Practitioner Sierra Vista, AZ Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1023697828 CMS profile 11201730

1800 E Wilcox Dr, Sierra Vista, AZ 85635

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,220

59 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Danielle Martin of Sierra Vista, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,220 across 59 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $524 29
2024 General $374 18
2023 General $188 10
2022 General $133 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Danielle Martin
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Danielle Martin were reported at $524. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Danielle Martin Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $0 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $133 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $188 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $374 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $524 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $229 8 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $129 7 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $101 6 payments
  4. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $99 6 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $96 5 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $64 4 payments
  7. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $64 3 payments
  8. Penumbra, Inc. $57 1 payment
  9. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $46 2 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $36 2 payments
  11. Other $299 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,220 59 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. XIFAXAN $132 8 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $129 7 payments
  3. FARXIGA $115 1 payment
  4. Kerendia $101 6 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $82 4 payments
  6. Indigo System $57 1 payment
  7. BRILINTA $52 3 payments
  8. EVENITY $47 3 payments
  9. GVOKE HYPOPEN $46 2 payments
  10. TRULANCE $46 3 payments
  11. Other $710 38 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 109 drugs

Part D claims

4,743

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$540,882

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

21.9%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 85 $81,791
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 33 $62,376
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 49 $48,987
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 40 $47,890
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 28 $35,906
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 53 $35,632
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 31 $27,236
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 20 $26,069
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 27 $26,005
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 34 $22,838

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 109 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$99,701

Of which drugs: $3,246

Medicare patients

381

Average age 75

Services billed

1,783

268 women, 113 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Osteoporosis 28%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 42 42 $3,128
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 121 $70

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $82
$82 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $46
$46 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $39
$39 34 —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $29
$29 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $29
$29 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

59 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record