Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Polansky

Internal Medicine Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1578561593 CMS profile 70802

1700 Spring Hill Ave Ste 100, Mobile, AL 36604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,891

1,107 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Daniel Polansky of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,891 across 1,107 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,352 223
2024 General $2,516 131
2023 General $2,529 149
2022 General $2,251 148
2021 General $2,759 200
2020 General $1,830 126
2019 General $1,653 130

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Polansky
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Polansky were reported at $3,352. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Polansky Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,653 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,830 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,759 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,251 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,529 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,516 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,352 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,462 288 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,330 215 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $921 54 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $877 52 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $786 85 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $769 56 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $656 25 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $582 36 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $480 32 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $405 30 payments
  11. Other $3,623 234 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,794 1,097 payments
  2. Education $97 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,018 102 payments
  2. Enbrel Inflammation $991 50 payments
  3. Otezla $985 56 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $796 52 payments
  5. TREMFYA $774 44 payments
  6. XARELTO $762 83 payments
  7. HUMIRA $754 40 payments
  8. ACTHAR $656 25 payments
  9. Cimzia $602 37 payments
  10. UBRELVY $529 46 payments
  11. Other $12,858 911 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 290 drugs

Part D claims

22,814

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,878,967

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

26.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 218 $245,486
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 278 $201,725
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 175 $178,439
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 119 $110,386
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 125 $102,720
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 98 $82,297
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 79 $68,165
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 59 $67,329
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 49 $63,109
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 55 $52,286

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 290 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 111 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$100,783

Of which drugs: $7,124

Medicare patients

261

Average age 74

Services billed

7,251

141 women, 120 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 71%
Ischemic heart disease 48%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Heart failure 29%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Depression 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 39 39 $3,027
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 72 $43
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 13 18 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
$304 — —
RINVOQ
$273 — —
SKYRIZI
$254 — —
Enbrel
$235 — —
TREMFYA
$211 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,107 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record