Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Kwiecien

Physician Assistant Auburn, MA Physician Assistant

NPI 1881052462 CMS profile 10923653

207 Southbridge St, Auburn, MA 01501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,366

521 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Daniel Kwiecien of Auburn, MA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,366 across 521 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,242 121
2024 General $3,159 115
2023 General $2,673 103
2022 General $2,130 85
2021 General $2,162 97

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Kwiecien
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Kwiecien were reported at $3,242. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Kwiecien Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,162 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,130 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $2,673 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $3,159 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $3,242 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,798 107 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $1,529 46 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,437 48 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,314 41 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,146 46 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $752 32 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $745 30 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $560 30 payments
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $538 29 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $481 23 payments
  11. Other $2,064 89 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,054 515 payments
  2. Education $312 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,634 51 payments
  2. Otezla $1,437 48 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,281 45 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $1,145 45 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $942 31 payments
  6. TREMFYA $892 32 payments
  7. CIBINQO $662 27 payments
  8. EUCRISA $542 21 payments
  9. ADBRY $441 17 payments
  10. LITFULO $387 17 payments
  11. Other $6,180 290 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

2,470

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$3,098,281

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

18.3%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 23 $494,235
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 115 $465,569
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 34 $464,449
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 52 $362,065
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 12 $273,356
Otezla Apremilast Brand 41 $197,676
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 22 $181,971
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 14 $148,504
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 14 $135,555
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 27 $100,445

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$127,307

Of which drugs: $10

Medicare patients

1,104

Average age 73

Services billed

3,426

434 women, 670 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 40%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Diabetes 22%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 15%
Depression 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 15 $10

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $369
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $240
$609 142 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $419
$419 22 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $352
$352 34 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $306
$306 23 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $260
$260 41 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

521 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Massachusetts

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record