Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Hardy

Neurology Richmond, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1932179462 CMS profile 268517

7301 Forest Ave, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23226

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$382,170

1,386 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Daniel Hardy of Richmond, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $382,170 across 1,386 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $96,853 243
2024 General $47,665 200
2023 General $49,775 218
2022 General $80,768 241
2021 General $53,296 182
2020 General $12,650 90
2019 General $41,162 212

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Hardy
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Hardy were reported at $96,853. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Hardy Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $41,162 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $12,650 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $53,296 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $80,768 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $49,775 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $47,665 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $96,853 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMD Serono, Inc. $200,679 296 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $79,708 150 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $47,518 187 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $19,730 34 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $14,767 32 payments
  6. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $5,863 17 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,767 92 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $1,091 41 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $932 25 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $900 56 payments
  11. Other $9,214 456 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $332,571 143 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $28,542 1,148 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $12,548 74 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $8,072 15 payments
  5. Education $437 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Mavenclad Neurology $139,344 79 payments
  2. UBRELVY $43,619 107 payments
  3. Mavenclad Neurology $38,258 61 payments
  4. VUMERITY Neurology $36,251 51 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $20,630 49 payments
  6. PLEGRIDY $18,084 27 payments
  7. VUMERITY Neurology $15,687 29 payments
  8. QULIPTA $15,546 78 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT Pain $12,613 22 payments
  10. Mavenclad Neurology $11,741 33 payments
  11. Other $32,513 869 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 60 drugs

Part D claims

2,173

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$481,734

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

29.6%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 14 $131,602
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 11 $92,032
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 35 $44,167
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 31 $41,746
Glatopa Glatiramer Acetate Brand 13 $34,944
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 37 $27,963
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 23 $22,930
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 11 $13,383
Teriflunomide Generic 22 $9,224
Eletriptan Hbr Eletriptan Hydrobromide Brand 26 $7,898

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 60 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$131,119

Of which drugs: $57,598

Medicare patients

609

Average age 76

Services billed

12,910

352 women, 257 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Depression 32%
Diabetes 30%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Alzheimer's or dementia 26%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 21 12,000 $57,598

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 53 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Mavenclad
$28,608 — —
VUMERITY
$9,798 11 —
UBRELVY
$4,208 31 —
TYSABRI
$365 — —
OCREVUS
$268 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 53 with Patron

Records

1,386 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record