Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Coyne

Nephrology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1427074749 CMS profile 19452

4921 Parkview Pl, Div Im Nephrology, Ste 5C, Saint Louis, MO 63110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$163,183

167 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$399,709 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Daniel Coyne of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $163,183 across 167 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $399,709 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $21,670 6
2024 General $8,755 10
2023 General $7,079 7
2022 General $21,496 13
2021 General $18,186 13
2020 General $14,075 8
2019 General $71,924 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Coyne
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Coyne were reported at $21,670. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Coyne Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $71,924 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $14,075 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $18,186 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $21,496 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $7,079 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $8,755 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $21,670 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. $67,611 91 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $20,430 31 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $19,669 12 payments
  4. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $18,797 7 payments
  5. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $16,855 13 payments
  6. Rockwell Medical, Inc. $5,475 2 payments
  7. Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ltd. $5,348 3 payments
  8. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $4,165 3 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $3,675 2 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $963 1 payment
  11. Other $197 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $77,864 34 payments
  2. Honoraria $48,487 39 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $21,458 46 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12,100 5 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $3,014 39 payments
  6. Education $260 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Velphoro Phosphate binder for ESRD $41,575 41 payments
  2. Critline - Monitors $15,065 31 payments
  3. Vafseo $8,755 10 payments
  4. LOKELMA $8,329 20 payments
  5. Triferic $5,475 2 payments
  6. Auryxia $2,125 2 payments
  7. Velphoro Potassium Binder $2,098 2 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $825 1 payment
  9. FARXIGA $108 1 payment
  10. ACTHAR $75 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

1,300

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$282,779

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

14%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 36 $121,345
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 12 $43,521
Auryxia Ferric Citrate Brand 15 $21,675
Renvela Sevelamer Carbonate Brand 15 $20,935
Lanthanum Carbonate Generic 25 $19,927
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 150 $14,772
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 18 $10,799
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 14 $8,637
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 15 $7,037
Clinolipid Fat Emulsion/Olive/Soy/Phospho Brand 12 $3,490

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$82,492

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

89

Average age 58

Services billed

413

40 women, 49 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 61%
Heart failure 54%
Ischemic heart disease 49%
Arthritis 38%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Depression 28%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Vafseo
  • AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS INC $8,692
$8,692 — —
Auryxia
  • AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS INC $63
$63 15 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

167 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record