Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Clayton

Pediatrics Draper, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1811979214 CMS profile 1212359

114 E 12450 S, #100, Draper, UT 84020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,391

86 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Daniel Clayton of Draper, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,391 across 86 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $138 8
2024 General $284 15
2023 General $181 10
2022 General $275 15
2021 General $210 12
2020 General $146 5
2019 General $157 21

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Clayton
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Clayton were reported at $138. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Clayton Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $157 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $146 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $210 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $275 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $181 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $284 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $138 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Corium, Inc. $265 17 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $229 25 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $186 10 payments
  4. Tris Pharma Inc $150 5 payments
  5. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $96 5 payments
  6. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $88 5 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $85 5 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $76 1 payment
  9. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $47 3 payments
  10. Cranial Technologies, Inc $34 2 payments
  11. Other $136 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,391 86 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Azstarys $265 17 payments
  2. GARDASIL 9 $186 10 payments
  3. VAXELIS $167 9 payments
  4. EUCRISA $130 18 payments
  5. ROTATEQ $113 6 payments
  6. VAXNEUVANCE $97 5 payments
  7. VAQTA $90 5 payments
  8. BEXSERO $85 5 payments
  9. PEDIARIX $85 5 payments
  10. Dyanavel XR $79 1 payment
  11. Other $824 45 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

86 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pediatrics in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record