Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daljeet Saluja

Family Medicine Baltimore, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1326011024 CMS profile 240959

6821 Reisterstown Rd, Suite 106, Baltimore, MD 21215

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$63,038

869 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Daljeet Saluja of Baltimore, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $63,038 across 869 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $12,639 130
2024 General $31,569 168
2023 General $8,756 165
2022 General $4,570 134
2021 General $2,706 123
2020 General $1,338 78
2019 General $1,460 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daljeet Saluja
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daljeet Saluja were reported at $12,639. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Daljeet Saluja Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,460 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,338 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,706 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $4,570 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $8,756 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $31,569 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $12,639 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $37,858 188 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $8,526 99 payments
  3. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $3,187 40 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,246 112 payments
  5. Dexcom, Inc. $2,232 36 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $959 33 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $880 21 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $766 40 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $597 41 payments
  10. Corcept Therapeutics $543 16 payments
  11. Other $5,244 243 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $33,323 28 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $21,692 811 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $5,344 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,459 23 payments
  5. Education $221 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AIRSUPRA $35,510 75 payments
  2. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $1,849 31 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,733 94 payments
  4. Ozempic $1,540 79 payments
  5. FARXIGA $1,209 66 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $1,184 64 payments
  7. Kerendia $959 33 payments
  8. BREZTRI $760 30 payments
  9. SOLIQUA 100/33 $692 22 payments
  10. Korlym $543 16 payments
  11. Other $11,918 532 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 150 drugs

Part D claims

12,256

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,850,335

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

23.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 181 $222,436
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 183 $211,063
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 143 $195,812
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 147 $159,120
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 133 $130,417
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 77 $120,742
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 61 $74,843
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 30 $64,863
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 59 $52,332
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 39 $47,399

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 150 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$112,294

Of which drugs: $4,820

Medicare patients

395

Average age 73

Services billed

2,126

234 women, 161 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Chronic kidney disease 49%
Diabetes 48%
Depression 33%
Heart failure 23%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
COPD 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 56 56 $4,500

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$22,921 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$291 181 —
AREXVY
$197 — —
BREZTRI
$176 13 —
Ozempic
$172 143 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

869 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record