Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Correal Garrison

Nurse Practitioner, Family New Albany, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1427421528 CMS profile 10746785

216 Oxford Rd, New Albany, MS 38652

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,215

783 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Correal Garrison of New Albany, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,215 across 783 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,661 110
2024 General $1,730 152
2023 General $2,203 154
2022 General $2,471 195
2021 General $2,150 172

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Correal Garrison
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Correal Garrison were reported at $1,661. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Correal Garrison Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $2,150 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $2,471 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $2,203 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $1,730 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $1,661 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,459 153 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $937 82 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $706 57 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $700 60 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $630 28 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $602 58 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $476 26 payments
  8. ITI, Inc. $376 22 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $353 45 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $332 19 payments
  11. Other $3,643 233 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,215 783 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $818 65 payments
  2. Ozempic $639 54 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $623 53 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT Pain $571 47 payments
  5. UBRELVY $524 52 payments
  6. Kerendia $476 26 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $440 34 payments
  8. QULIPTA $434 45 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $402 47 payments
  10. FARXIGA $387 15 payments
  11. Other $7,503 555 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 115 drugs

Part D claims

5,247

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$336,363

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 84 $92,520
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 65 $41,054
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 36 $32,510
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 31 $25,209
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 34 $21,646
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 20 $19,048
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 19 $16,307
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 15 $12,887
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 18 $11,418
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 12 $7,779

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 115 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 78 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$50,292

Of which drugs: $1,280

Medicare patients

367

Average age 73

Services billed

3,174

224 women, 143 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 39%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
COPD 21%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Depression 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 83 399 $116
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 14 15 $61
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 87 711 $52
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 19 92 $42
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 37 272 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $200
$200 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $185
$185 — —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $82
  • Lundbeck LLC $63
$145 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $124
$124 12 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $92
$92 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

783 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record