Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Conan Tu

Internal Medicine Massapequa, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1083794440 CMS profile 992357

4150 Sunrise Hwy, Massapequa, NY 11758

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$319,788

958 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Conan Tu of Massapequa, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $319,788 across 958 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $198,057 299
2024 General $80,236 170
2023 General $8,375 87
2022 General $9,605 143
2021 General $11,301 96
2020 General $3,127 63
2019 General $9,085 100

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Conan Tu
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Conan Tu were reported at $198,057. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Conan Tu Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $9,085 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,127 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $11,301 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $9,605 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $8,375 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $80,236 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $198,057 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $172,553 154 payments
  2. Sanofi US Services Inc. $25,403 5 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $25,323 73 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $22,776 11 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $22,343 78 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $9,540 69 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $9,100 66 payments
  8. Insulet Corporation $4,324 14 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $4,317 77 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $2,028 47 payments
  11. Other $22,081 364 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $143,583 40 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $85,535 26 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $48,151 815 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $35,513 69 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $7,000 7 payments
  6. Education $6 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TZIELD $197,427 137 payments
  2. FreeStyle Libre 3 $21,062 52 payments
  3. Ozempic $12,371 36 payments
  4. Victoza $10,782 7 payments
  5. FARXIGA $6,750 33 payments
  6. Omnipod $4,324 14 payments
  7. OFEV $4,221 9 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $2,681 30 payments
  9. Repatha $2,434 35 payments
  10. DISEASE STATE $2,425 4 payments
  11. Other $36,965 748 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 81 drugs

Part D claims

3,178

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,463,053

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

47%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 321 $431,522
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 157 $240,953
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 59 $111,380
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 52 $102,928
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 77 $101,908
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 56 $75,801
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 45 $63,599
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 39 $41,994
Synjardy Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 22 $32,895
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 28 $29,049

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 81 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 79 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$194,111

Of which drugs: $31,214

Medicare patients

362

Average age 75

Services billed

5,751

179 women, 183 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Diabetes 49%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Osteoporosis 17%
Depression 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 46 46 $13,335
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 77 77 $6,300

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TZIELD
$62,986 — —
Victoza
$9,852 — —
Repatha
$552 18 —
JARDIANCE
$319 45 —
MOUNJARO
$318 321 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

958 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record