Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Colicia Meyerowitz

Internal Medicine Silver City, NM Medical Doctor

NPI 1609827799 CMS profile 1262506

1600 E 32Nd St, Silver City, NM 88061

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29

2 records reported · program year 2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Colicia Meyerowitz of Silver City, NM is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29 across 2 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 11th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $29 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Colicia Meyerowitz
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Colicia Meyerowitz were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Colicia Meyerowitz Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $0 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $0 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $0 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $29 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2024
  1. Exact Sciences Corporation $29 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2024
  1. Food and Beverage $29 2 payments
Products named General payments · program year 2024
  1. Cologuard Collection Kit $29 2 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 251 drugs

Part D claims

16,981

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,448,623

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 205 $175,332
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 95 $112,621
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 70 $103,679
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 78 $96,194
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 100 $92,215
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 11 $76,421
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 34 $41,284
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 32 $39,841
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 36 $38,498
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 46 $32,750

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 251 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 124 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$201,322

Of which drugs: $31,551

Medicare patients

607

Average age 77

Services billed

6,825

443 women, 164 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 23%
Heart failure 17%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Depression 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 65 66 $18,956
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 43 43 $6,797
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 15 15 $2,024
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 85 85 $1,862
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90756 Office 17 17 $539
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 16 491 $49

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

2 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New Mexico

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record