Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Cody Wasner

Rheumatology Springfield, OR Medical Doctor

NPI 1245222322 CMS profile 10614

1007 Harlow Rd Ste 210, Springfield, OR 97477

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$112,713

330 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Cody Wasner of Springfield, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $112,713 across 330 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $547 27
2023 General $411 26
2022 General $23,624 60
2021 General $4,425 14
2020 General $17,197 45
2019 General $66,508 158

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Cody Wasner
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Cody Wasner were reported at $0. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Cody Wasner Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $66,508 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $17,197 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $4,425 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $23,624 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $411 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $547 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $0 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $59,979 82 payments
  2. Celgene Corporation $20,262 43 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $17,940 54 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $12,192 32 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $908 38 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $305 17 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $244 22 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $233 13 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $225 8 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $125 4 payments
  11. Other $299 17 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $85,089 42 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $14,006 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $7,100 25 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $6,496 256 payments
  5. Education $22 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. OLUMIANT $38,675 41 payments
  2. Otezla Dermatology $20,123 27 payments
  3. TALTZ $18,571 31 payments
  4. Otezla Inflammation $14,928 27 payments
  5. COSENTYX Immunology $11,588 30 payments
  6. Otezla Inflammation $2,652 2 payments
  7. COSENTYX Dermatology $604 2 payments
  8. RINVOQ $510 21 payments
  9. Actemra $305 17 payments
  10. HUMIRA $303 15 payments
  11. Other $2,183 129 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

2,349

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$980,605

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 38 $236,703
Otezla Apremilast Brand 45 $217,518
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 24 $176,768
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $91,260
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 13 $88,461
Olumiant Baricitinib Brand 30 $85,435
Rayos Prednisone Brand 11 $29,428
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 361 $13,415
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 418 $9,831
Leucovorin Calcium Generic 167 $8,281

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$38,005

Of which drugs: $1,384

Medicare patients

140

Average age 74

Services billed

942

107 women, 33 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 63%
Osteoporosis 35%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 22%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 54 200 $1,089
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 28 153 $120

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $164
$164 38 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $125
$125 24 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $114
$114 45 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $61
$61 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

330 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record