Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Clint Tucker

Dermatology Louisville, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1629394713 CMS profile 119507

310 E Broadway, Suite 200, Louisville, KY 40202

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$50,110

1,410 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Clint Tucker of Louisville, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $50,110 across 1,410 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $12,927 318
2024 General $8,431 253
2023 General $10,008 199
2022 General $4,379 196
2021 General $4,429 164
2020 General $2,096 124
2019 General $7,840 156

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Clint Tucker
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Clint Tucker were reported at $12,927. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Clint Tucker Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,840 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,096 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $4,429 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $4,379 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $10,008 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $8,431 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $12,927 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $15,348 329 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $7,168 112 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $5,795 64 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $3,226 52 payments
  5. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $3,166 57 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,196 129 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,938 93 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $1,925 89 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,745 74 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $1,694 91 payments
  11. Other $5,909 320 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $25,795 1,382 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $23,235 11 payments
  3. Education $1,061 16 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $6,632 141 payments
  2. CIBINQO $5,412 39 payments
  3. Bimzelx $4,899 71 payments
  4. HUMIRA $4,874 89 payments
  5. RINVOQ $4,149 97 payments
  6. NEMLUVIO $2,867 29 payments
  7. TREMFYA $2,086 84 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,690 95 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,544 63 payments
  10. TALTZ $1,483 81 payments
  11. Other $13,776 791 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

2,398

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$2,127,346

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

17.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 26 $547,237
Skyrizi Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 16 $335,708
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 77 $316,498
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 14 $244,199
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 28 $179,244
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $150,542
Otezla Apremilast Brand 22 $102,648
Sotyktu Deucravacitinib Brand 14 $89,137
Cibinqo Abrocitinib Brand 12 $65,735
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 13 $50,925

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$261,046

Of which drugs: $87,205

Medicare patients

1,065

Average age 75

Services billed

6,628

537 women, 528 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
COPD 16%
Depression 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 72 298 $197

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$4,158 — —
DUPIXENT
$749 90 —
SKYRIZI
$479 42 —
RINVOQ
$436 28 —
COSENTYX
$330 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,410 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Kentucky

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record