Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Clark Griffith

Obstetrics & Gynecology Dallas, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1588666242 CMS profile 117114

8160 Walnut Hill Ln, Suite #116, Dallas, TX 75231

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,084

187 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,294,182 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Clark Griffith of Dallas, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,084 across 187 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,294,182 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Obstetrics & Gynecology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $320 17
2024 General $616 23
2023 General $745 44
2022 General $552 59
2021 General $162 7
2020 General $124 7
2019 General $566 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Clark Griffith
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology median
  • Middle half of Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Clark Griffith were reported at $320. Among 21,306 Obstetrics & Gynecology profiles paid that year, the median was $158 and the middle half received between $51 and $401.

Show as a table
Year Clark Griffith Obstetrics & Gynecology median Middle half National median
2019 $566 $172 $62–$391 $163
2020 $124 $94 $36–$222 $114
2021 $162 $136 $42–$369 $132
2022 $552 $160 $50–$433 $149
2023 $745 $169 $56–$423 $160
2024 $616 $152 $50–$371 $164
2025 $320 $158 $51–$401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ASCEND Therapeutics US, LLC $366 61 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $289 18 payments
  3. Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C. $258 1 payment
  4. Exeltis, USA Inc. $241 13 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $186 9 payments
  6. Organon LLC $181 9 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $173 7 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $168 10 payments
  9. Gynesonics, Inc. $136 3 payments
  10. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $111 7 payments
  11. Other $976 49 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,771 149 payments
  2. Education $258 1 payment
  3. Gift $41 36 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $15 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ESTROGEL $303 47 payments
  2. Veozah $274 17 payments
  3. Procalcitonin $258 1 payment
  4. NEXPLANON Womens Health $173 7 payments
  5. PREMARIN $143 9 payments
  6. SONATA SONOGRAPHY-GUIDED TRANSCERVICAL FIBROID ABLATION SYSTEM $136 3 payments
  7. NEXPLANON Etonogestrel $131 7 payments
  8. ORILISSA $107 5 payments
  9. MYFEMBREE $103 6 payments
  10. INTRAROSA $98 4 payments
  11. Other $1,964 122 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

384

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 65

Drug cost

$18,503

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: $3,585

Branded share of claims

35.4%

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 25.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 12 $6,153
Estradiol Generic 87 $5,209
Estradiol-Norethindrone Acetat Estradiol/Norethindrone Acet Brand 30 $1,731
Raloxifene Hcl Generic 28 $1,252
Estradiol (Twice Weekly) Estradiol Brand 15 $1,226
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 24 $1,106
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 17 $633
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 19 $385
Progesterone Progesterone, Micronized Brand 13 $312
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 13 $153

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 24,311 Part D prescribers listed as Obstetrics & Gynecology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$21,094

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

149

Average age 72

Services billed

441

149 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 50%
Arthritis 45%
Osteoporosis 25%
Ischemic heart disease 15%
Depression 15%
Cancer 14%
Diabetes 10%
COPD 7%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $158
$158 — —
SLYND
  • Exeltis, USA Inc. $31
$31 — —
ABRYSVO
  • PFIZER INC. $21
$21 — —
MYFEMBREE
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $15
  • PFIZER INC. $4
$19 — —
DUAVEE
  • PFIZER INC. $4
$4 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

187 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Obstetrics & Gynecology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record