Who Paid My Doc
Claire Dillingham
Plastic Surgery Greensboro, NC Doctor of Osteopathy
NPI 1902006646 CMS profile 358343
1002 N Church St Ste 100, Greensboro, NC 27401
General payments
$142,084
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Claire Dillingham of Greensboro, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $142,084 across 247 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Plastic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $24,667 | 55 | |
| 2024 | General | $1,163 | 21 | |
| 2023 | General | $15,994 | 40 | |
| 2022 | General | $26,922 | 34 | |
| 2021 | General | $22,746 | 42 | |
| 2020 | General | $18,364 | 20 | |
| 2019 | General | $32,228 | 35 |
Beside peers
- Claire Dillingham
- Plastic Surgery median
- Middle half of Plastic Surgery
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Claire Dillingham were reported at $24,667. Among 3,701 Plastic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $379 and the middle half received between $138 and $1,100.
Show as a table
| Year | Claire Dillingham | Plastic Surgery median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $32,228 | $371 | $122–$1,483 | $163 |
| 2020 | $18,364 | $158 | $52–$438 | $114 |
| 2021 | $22,746 | $249 | $87–$752 | $132 |
| 2022 | $26,922 | $274 | $102–$793 | $149 |
| 2023 | $15,994 | $299 | $113–$891 | $160 |
| 2024 | $1,163 | $361 | $124–$1,062 | $164 |
| 2025 | $24,667 | $379 | $138–$1,100 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$24,456
Medicare patients
60
Services billed
135
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Arthritis | 55% | |
| Cancer | 37% | |
| Diabetes | 23% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 23% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 23% | |
| Depression | 22% | |
| Heart failure | 20% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
247 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Plastic Surgery in North Carolina
Related records
Plastic Surgery in North Carolina
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Plastic Surgery
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in North Carolina
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.