Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Christopher Smith

Cardiovascular Disease Greenville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1831181486 CMS profile 37371

1005 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC 29605

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,483

492 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$39,589 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Christopher Smith of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,483 across 492 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $39,589 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $544 21
2024 General $444 21
2023 General $758 40
2022 General $1,454 94
2021 General $1,324 76
2020 General $882 63
2019 General $2,078 177

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Christopher Smith
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Christopher Smith were reported at $544. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Christopher Smith Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $2,078 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $882 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,324 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $1,454 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $758 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $444 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $544 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $782 53 payments
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $780 96 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $637 45 payments
  4. Cardiovascular Systems Inc. $525 29 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $412 24 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $381 30 payments
  7. Medtronic, Inc. $337 23 payments
  8. Atricure, Inc. $334 16 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $320 23 payments
  10. Abiomed $317 12 payments
  11. Other $2,657 141 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,459 490 payments
  2. Education $24 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $782 53 payments
  2. XARELTO $780 96 payments
  3. ENTRESTO $478 37 payments
  4. Corlanor $340 20 payments
  5. VERQUVO $320 23 payments
  6. SYNERGY ABLATION SYSTEM $284 13 payments
  7. Barostim Neo System $268 6 payments
  8. Diamondback Coronary $260 14 payments
  9. Impella $259 9 payments
  10. LifeVest $257 23 payments
  11. Other $3,804 213 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 67 drugs

Part D claims

8,726

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,278,743

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

26.2%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 648 $721,707
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 159 $151,844
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 189 $141,792
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 54 $60,781
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 17 $36,615
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 24 $26,862
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 21 $12,970
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 867 $11,470
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 90 $9,601
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 14 $7,503

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 67 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$239,268

Of which drugs: $1,985

Medicare patients

1,357

Average age 77

Services billed

4,257

660 women, 697 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 63%
Arthritis 54%
Atrial fibrillation 43%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Heart failure 36%
Diabetes 35%
Depression 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, perflutren lipid microspheres, per ml Q9957 Office 16 32 $998
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 41 164 $986

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

492 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record