Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Christopher Scola

Rheumatology Glastonbury, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1386625432 CMS profile 243907

195 Eastern Blvd, # 201, Glastonbury, CT 06033

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,442

1,163 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Christopher Scola of Glastonbury, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,442 across 1,163 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,867 299
2024 General $5,435 276
2023 General $2,880 170
2022 General $2,430 151
2021 General $2,040 133
2020 General $335 24
2019 General $1,455 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Christopher Scola
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Christopher Scola were reported at $5,867. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Christopher Scola Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,455 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $335 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,040 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,430 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,880 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $5,435 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $5,867 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,954 340 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,160 122 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,931 137 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,547 92 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,006 36 payments
  6. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $952 44 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $831 60 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $718 40 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $703 35 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $623 29 payments
  11. Other $5,017 228 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,121 1,159 payments
  2. Education $321 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $3,563 228 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,584 104 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $960 34 payments
  4. ACTHAR $952 44 payments
  5. Cimzia $867 46 payments
  6. Enbrel $724 48 payments
  7. HUMIRA $713 60 payments
  8. ORENCIA $685 34 payments
  9. Bimzelx $680 46 payments
  10. TALTZ $603 28 payments
  11. Other $11,766 687 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

3,744

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,738,527

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

20.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 70 $610,936
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 41 $336,762
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 27 $203,372
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 27 $182,781
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 21 $133,720
Otezla Apremilast Brand 14 $122,401
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 12 $68,293
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 785 $25,138
Hadlima(Cf) Adalimumab-Bwwd Brand 12 $11,941
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 417 $8,697

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$746,567

Of which drugs: $627,711

Medicare patients

314

Average age 76

Services billed

61,190

213 women, 101 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Atrial fibrillation 30%
Osteoporosis 30%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 17 4,250 $260,701
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 17 12,050 $108,872
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,741 $35,607
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 52 4,281 $434
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 18 974 $220
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 21 25 $169

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$817 21 —
TREMFYA
$483 — —
ACTHAR
$423 — —
SAPHNELO
$381 — —
Enbrel
$283 97 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,163 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record