Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Christopher Pratt

Pain Medicine Fort Worth, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1700851292 CMS profile 213377

1651 W Rosedale, Suite 205, Fort Worth, TX 76104

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$34,139

756 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Christopher Pratt of Fort Worth, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $34,139 across 756 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,703 105
2024 General $10,257 134
2023 General $4,832 103
2022 General $5,822 141
2021 General $2,668 105
2020 General $1,583 59
2019 General $5,273 109

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Christopher Pratt
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Christopher Pratt were reported at $3,703. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Christopher Pratt Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,273 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $1,583 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $2,668 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $5,822 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $4,832 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $10,257 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $3,703 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MML US, Inc. $9,578 102 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $4,338 62 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $4,122 121 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,170 64 payments
  5. Nevro Corp. $1,977 22 payments
  6. Nalu Medical, Inc. $1,876 34 payments
  7. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $1,161 9 payments
  8. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $910 27 payments
  9. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $906 59 payments
  10. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $835 40 payments
  11. Other $6,265 216 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $26,636 732 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,400 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,018 17 payments
  4. Education $85 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ReActiv8 $9,578 102 payments
  2. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $3,731 53 payments
  3. Nalu Neurostimulation System $1,876 34 payments
  4. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $1,504 41 payments
  5. PROCLAIM $1,479 41 payments
  6. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $1,232 11 payments
  7. SPRINT PNS System $1,161 9 payments
  8. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $976 27 payments
  9. Superion ISS $779 10 payments
  10. Omnia $705 11 payments
  11. Other $12,080 427 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

2,553

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$83,463

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

81.4%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,616 $43,265
Hysingla Er Hydrocodone Bitartrate Brand 24 $12,226
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 279 $7,558
Buprenorphine Generic 30 $7,270
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 126 $3,440
Fentanyl Generic 23 $2,567
Pregabalin Generic 64 $1,759
Tramadol Hcl Er Tramadol Hcl Brand 21 $1,273
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 82 $1,095
Gabapentin Generic 94 $1,004

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$382,987

Of which drugs: $5,424

Medicare patients

1,089

Average age 75

Services billed

5,103

598 women, 491 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 31%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Osteoporosis 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 63 171 $947

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $197
$197 — —
ZTLido
  • Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $65
$65 — —
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $21
$21 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

756 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record