Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Christopher Huffman

Interventional Cardiology Columbia, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1780826651 CMS profile 670535

1655 Bernardin Ave Ste 220, Columbia, SC 29204

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,778

284 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Christopher Huffman of Columbia, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,778 across 284 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Interventional Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $177 4
2024 General $1,343 19
2023 General $5,756 23
2022 General $1,209 8
2021 General $8,607 60
2020 General $1,347 56
2019 General $2,339 114

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Christopher Huffman
  • Interventional Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Interventional Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Christopher Huffman were reported at $177. Among 6,173 Interventional Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,092 and the middle half received between $366 and $3,019.

Show as a table
Year Christopher Huffman Interventional Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,339 $1,097 $329–$3,048 $163
2020 $1,347 $473 $161–$1,480 $114
2021 $8,607 $677 $233–$1,827 $132
2022 $1,209 $978 $333–$2,724 $149
2023 $5,756 $1,136 $382–$2,986 $160
2024 $1,343 $1,181 $395–$3,326 $164
2025 $177 $1,092 $366–$3,019 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $14,874 48 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,061 17 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $960 57 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $688 39 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $574 22 payments
  6. Kestra Medical Technology Services, Inc. $552 11 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $392 21 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $340 18 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $267 17 payments
  10. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. $222 4 payments
  11. Other $848 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $13,500 12 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $7,174 263 payments
  3. Education $105 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LifeVest $14,874 48 payments
  2. ENTRESTO $839 55 payments
  3. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $688 39 payments
  4. XARELTO $574 22 payments
  5. Assure WCD $552 11 payments
  6. WATCHMAN Access System $472 7 payments
  7. Repatha $267 17 payments
  8. ZIO Patch $222 4 payments
  9. FARXIGA $177 5 payments
  10. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $176 14 payments
  11. Other $1,686 62 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

3,589

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$631,937

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

31.8%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 319 $325,515
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 61 $65,473
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 34 $46,522
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 39 $40,131
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 37 $39,648
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 42 $35,847
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 16 $18,833
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 35 $6,812
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 286 $4,886
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 231 $4,147

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 74 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$493,783

Of which drugs: $1,690

Medicare patients

1,560

Average age 75

Services billed

9,496

835 women, 725 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 57%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 42%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Heart failure 32%
Atrial fibrillation 32%
Depression 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 73 292 $1,690

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ONPATTRO
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $23
$23 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $23
$23 61 —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $19
$19 34 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $15
$15 16 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

284 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record