Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Christopher Connelly

Clinical Neurophysiology Concord, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1457321978 CMS profile 293022

315 Medical Park Dr, Ste 202, Concord, NC 28025

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$431

22 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Christopher Connelly of Concord, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $431 across 22 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 30th percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $56 2
2023 General $308 16
2022 General $49 3
2020 General $17 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Christopher Connelly
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Christopher Connelly were reported at $56. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Christopher Connelly Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $17 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $0 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $49 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $308 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $0 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $56 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $72 3 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $56 2 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $47 2 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $43 2 payments
  5. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $38 2 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $34 2 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $32 2 payments
  8. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $28 2 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $18 1 payment
  10. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $17 1 payment
  11. Other $46 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $431 22 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. TYSABRI $72 3 payments
  2. UPLIZNA $56 2 payments
  3. VUMERITY $54 2 payments
  4. ZEPOSIA $43 2 payments
  5. BRIUMVI $38 2 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $34 2 payments
  7. EMGALITY $32 2 payments
  8. AMYVID $32 2 payments
  9. QULIPTA $28 1 payment
  10. KEVEYIS $28 2 payments
  11. Other $133 8 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 141 drugs

Part D claims

10,094

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,301,369

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

20.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 14 $211,380
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 21 $174,566
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 19 $162,150
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 135 $115,363
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 43 $67,122
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 13 $64,383
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 53 $62,043
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 25 $51,946
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 40 $37,794
Savella Milnacipran Hcl Brand 51 $33,200

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 141 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$68,123

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

475

Average age 73

Services billed

923

270 women, 205 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Depression 37%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

22 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record